√673 at a glance
- Exact value
- √673
- Decimal (10 places)
- 25.9422435421
- Rounded
- 25.9 · 25.94 · 25.942
- Perfect square?
- No — between 25² and 26²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±25.942244
- Prime factorization
- 673
- Cube root
- 8.763381
How to simplify √673
673 is a prime number, so its only factors are 1 and 673. There is no perfect-square factor to pull out, which means √673 is already in its simplest radical form.
The square root of any prime is irrational. If √673 were a fraction a/b in lowest terms, then a² = 673b², so 673 would divide a — and then 673 would divide b too, contradicting “lowest terms.” That is why the decimal 25.9422435421 is only a rounded value.
Where √673 sits between perfect squares
625 = 25² and 676 = 26² are the nearest perfect squares, so √673 lies between 25 and 26. 673 is 48 above 625 and 3 below 676, so the root is closer to 26.
- Straight line between 625 and 676: 25.9412 (0% low)
- Tangent from 25, i.e. 25 + 48 ÷ 50: 25.9600 (0.07% high)
- Tangent from 26, i.e. 26 − 3 ÷ 52: 25.9423 (0% high)
For √673 the tangent at 26 wins, missing by only 0.0001. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 673 is just 3 below 676.
Finding √673 with the Babylonian method
This is Newton’s method applied to f(x) = x² − 673: following the tangent line down to zero simplifies to averaging x with 673 ÷ x.
Start from the nearest whole number, 26 (26² = 676):
| Step | Guess x | 673 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0000000000 | 25.8846153846 | 25.9423076923 | 4 |
| 2 | 25.9423076923 | 25.9421793921 | 25.9422435422 | 10 |
| 3 | 25.9422435422 | 25.9422435421 | 25.9422435421 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 4, 10 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √673 = 25.9422435421 to every decimal shown.
√673 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √673 the pattern is [25; 1, 16, 3, 5, 2, 3, 1, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, …] with the block of 31 terms after the semicolon repeating forever (only the first 12 of the 31 are shown). A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √673 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 25/1 | 25.0000000000 | 9.4 × 10⁻¹ |
| 26/1 | 26.0000000000 | 5.8 × 10⁻² |
| 441/17 | 25.9411764706 | 1.1 × 10⁻³ |
| 1,349/52 | 25.9423076923 | 6.4 × 10⁻⁵ |
| 7,186/277 | 25.9422382671 | 5.3 × 10⁻⁶ |
| 15,721/606 | 25.9422442244 | 6.8 × 10⁻⁷ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 673y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 4,765,506,835,465,395,993,032,041,249, y = 183,696,788,896,587,421,699,032,600 — 28 digits for x, even though 673 is small, which is what makes Pell’s equation famous. Because the period is odd, the equation with −1 on the right also has a solution: 48,813,455,293,932² − 673 × 1,881,620,424,025² = −1.
√673 in geometry and everyday measurements
- 673 square feet is 62.5 m². Laid out as a square — a small house footprint or a lot — it is about 25.94 ft (25 ft 11 in) on a side.
- 673 = 12² + 23², so by the Pythagorean theorem √673 is the diagonal of a 12 × 23 rectangle — and the distance between the points (0, 0) and (12, 23) on a grid.
Square roots near √673 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √670 | √670 | 25.8844 | No |
| √671 | √671 | 25.9037 | No |
| √672 | 4√42 | 25.9230 | No |
| √673 | √673 | 25.9422 | No |
| √674 | √674 | 25.9615 | No |
| √675 | 15√3 | 25.9808 | No |
| √676 | 26 | 26.0000 | Yes |
- The cube root of 673 is about 8.763381.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√673)² = 673, while 673² = 452,929 — the number whose square root is 673.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 673?
The square root of 673 is √673, about 25.9422435421. The negative root, −25.942244, also squares to 673.
Is the square root of 673 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 673 is not a perfect square — it falls between 625 and 676 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √673 be simplified?
No. 673 is prime, so there is no perfect square to take out of the radical.
What is √673 rounded to two decimal places?
√673 ≈ 25.94 to two decimal places (25.9 to one, 25.942 to three). Check: 25.94² = 672.8836, close to 673.