√298 at a glance
- Exact value
- √298
- Decimal (10 places)
- 17.2626765016
- Rounded
- 17.3 · 17.26 · 17.263
- Perfect square?
- No — between 17² and 18²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±17.262677
- Prime factorization
- 2 × 149
- Cube root
- 6.679420
How to simplify √298
The prime factorization of 298 is 2 × 149. Every prime appears only once, so there is no pair to bring outside the radical — √298 is already in simplest form (a "square-free" radicand).
A whole number has a rational square root only when every prime in its factorization appears an even number of times. In 298, 2 and 149 appear an odd number of times, so √298 is irrational and 17.2626765016 is a rounded value.
Where √298 sits between perfect squares
289 = 17² and 324 = 18² are the nearest perfect squares, so √298 lies between 17 and 18. 298 is 9 above 289 and 26 below 324, so the root is closer to 17.
- Straight line between 289 and 324: 17.2571 (0.03% low)
- Tangent from 17, i.e. 17 + 9 ÷ 34: 17.2647 (0.01% high)
- Tangent from 18, i.e. 18 − 26 ÷ 36: 17.2778 (0.09% high)
For √298 the tangent at 17 wins, missing by only 0.002. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 298 is just 9 above 289.
Finding √298 with the Babylonian method
The idea is ancient. A Babylonian clay tablet catalogued as YBC 7289, about 3,800 years old, records √2 correct to roughly six decimal places, and Heron of Alexandria described this averaging rule in the first century AD.
Start from the nearest whole number, 17 (17² = 289):
| Step | Guess x | 298 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.0000000000 | 17.5294117647 | 17.2647058824 | 2 |
| 2 | 17.2647058824 | 17.2606473595 | 17.2626766209 | 6 |
| 3 | 17.2626766209 | 17.2626763824 | 17.2626765016 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 2, 6 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √298 = 17.2626765016 to every decimal shown.
√298 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √298 the pattern is [17; 3, 1, 4, 5, 1, 1, 5, 4, 1, 3, 34] with the block of 11 terms after the semicolon repeating forever. A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √298 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 17/1 | 17.0000000000 | 2.6 × 10⁻¹ |
| 52/3 | 17.3333333333 | 7.1 × 10⁻² |
| 69/4 | 17.2500000000 | 1.3 × 10⁻² |
| 328/19 | 17.2631578947 | 4.8 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 1,709/99 | 17.2626262626 | 5.0 × 10⁻⁵ |
| 2,037/118 | 17.2627118644 | 3.5 × 10⁻⁵ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 298y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 335,473,872,499, y = 19,433,479,650. Because the period is odd, the equation with −1 on the right also has a solution: 409,557² − 298 × 23,725² = −1.
√298 in geometry and everyday measurements
- A square patio or deck of 298 square feet is about 17.26 ft (17 ft 3 in) on each side, so edging all the way around takes 4 × √298 ≈ 69.1 ft.
- 298 = 3² + 17², so by the Pythagorean theorem √298 is the diagonal of a 3 × 17 rectangle — and the distance between the points (0, 0) and (3, 17) on a grid.
Square roots near √298 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √295 | √295 | 17.1756 | No |
| √296 | 2√74 | 17.2047 | No |
| √297 | 3√33 | 17.2337 | No |
| √298 | √298 | 17.2627 | No |
| √299 | √299 | 17.2916 | No |
| √300 | 10√3 | 17.3205 | No |
| √301 | √301 | 17.3494 | No |
- The cube root of 298 is about 6.679420.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√298)² = 298, while 298² = 88,804 — the number whose square root is 298.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 298?
The square root of 298 is √298, about 17.2626765016. The negative root, −17.262677, also squares to 298.
Is the square root of 298 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 298 is not a perfect square — it falls between 289 and 324 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √298 be simplified?
No. 298 = 2 × 149 has no repeated prime factor, so there is no perfect square to take out of the radical.
What is √298 rounded to two decimal places?
√298 ≈ 17.26 to two decimal places (17.3 to one, 17.263 to three). Check: 17.26² = 297.9076, close to 298.