√301 at a glance
- Exact value
- √301
- Decimal (10 places)
- 17.3493515729
- Rounded
- 17.3 · 17.35 · 17.349
- Perfect square?
- No — between 17² and 18²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±17.349352
- Prime factorization
- 7 × 43
- Cube root
- 6.701759
How to simplify √301
The prime factorization of 301 is 7 × 43. Every prime appears only once, so there is no pair to bring outside the radical — √301 is already in simplest form (a "square-free" radicand).
A whole number has a rational square root only when every prime in its factorization appears an even number of times. In 301, 7 and 43 appear an odd number of times, so √301 is irrational and 17.3493515729 is a rounded value.
Where √301 sits between perfect squares
289 = 17² and 324 = 18² are the nearest perfect squares, so √301 lies between 17 and 18. 301 is 12 above 289 and 23 below 324, so the root is closer to 17.
- Straight line between 289 and 324: 17.3429 (0.04% low)
- Tangent from 17, i.e. 17 + 12 ÷ 34: 17.3529 (0.02% high)
- Tangent from 18, i.e. 18 − 23 ÷ 36: 17.3611 (0.07% high)
For √301 the tangent at 17 wins, missing by only 0.0036. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 301 is just 12 above 289.
Finding √301 with the Babylonian method
This is Newton’s method applied to f(x) = x² − 301: following the tangent line down to zero simplifies to averaging x with 301 ÷ x.
Start from the nearest whole number, 17 (17² = 289):
| Step | Guess x | 301 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.0000000000 | 17.7058823529 | 17.3529411765 | 2 |
| 2 | 17.3529411765 | 17.3457627119 | 17.3493519442 | 6 |
| 3 | 17.3493519442 | 17.3493512016 | 17.3493515729 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 2, 6 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √301 = 17.3493515729 to every decimal shown.
√301 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √301 the pattern is [17; 2, 1, 6, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 8, 11, 2, …] with the block of 26 terms after the semicolon repeating forever (only the first 12 of the 26 are shown). A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √301 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 17/1 | 17.0000000000 | 3.5 × 10⁻¹ |
| 35/2 | 17.5000000000 | 1.5 × 10⁻¹ |
| 52/3 | 17.3333333333 | 1.6 × 10⁻² |
| 347/20 | 17.3500000000 | 6.5 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 1,093/63 | 17.3492063492 | 1.5 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 1,440/83 | 17.3493975904 | 4.6 × 10⁻⁵ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 301y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 5,883,392,537,695, y = 339,113,108,232 — 13 digits for x, even though 301 is small, which is what makes Pell’s equation famous.
√301 in geometry and everyday measurements
- A square patio or deck of 301 square feet is about 17.35 ft (17 ft 4 in) on each side, so edging all the way around takes 4 × √301 ≈ 69.4 ft.
- 301 is not a sum of two whole-number squares — the prime factor 7 and 43 (one less than a multiple of 4) appears an odd number of times, which rules that out — so √301 is never the diagonal of a rectangle with whole-number sides. It is, however, the space diagonal of a 3 × 6 × 16 box, because 3² + 6² + 16² = 301.
Square roots near √301 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √298 | √298 | 17.2627 | No |
| √299 | √299 | 17.2916 | No |
| √300 | 10√3 | 17.3205 | No |
| √301 | √301 | 17.3494 | No |
| √302 | √302 | 17.3781 | No |
| √303 | √303 | 17.4069 | No |
| √304 | 4√19 | 17.4356 | No |
- The cube root of 301 is about 6.701759.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√301)² = 301, while 301² = 90,601 — the number whose square root is 301.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 301?
The square root of 301 is √301, about 17.3493515729. The negative root, −17.349352, also squares to 301.
Is the square root of 301 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 301 is not a perfect square — it falls between 289 and 324 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √301 be simplified?
No. 301 = 7 × 43 has no repeated prime factor, so there is no perfect square to take out of the radical.
What is √301 rounded to two decimal places?
√301 ≈ 17.35 to two decimal places (17.3 to one, 17.349 to three). Check: 17.35² = 301.0225, close to 301.