√297 at a glance
- Exact value
- 3√33
- Decimal (10 places)
- 17.2336879396
- Rounded
- 17.2 · 17.23 · 17.234
- Perfect square?
- No — between 17² and 18²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±17.233688
- Prime factorization
- 3³ × 11
- Cube root
- 6.671940
How to simplify √297
Look for the largest perfect square that divides 297. Here it is 9 (3²), because 297 = 9 × 33 and 33 has no square factor left:
The prime factorization tells the same story: 297 = 3³ × 11. Each pair of equal primes leaves the radical as one factor, so 3 comes out and 3 × 11 stays inside.
Check: (3√33)² = 3² × 33 = 9 × 33 = 297. As a decimal, 3√33 = 3 × 5.7445626465 ≈ 17.2336879396.
Where √297 sits between perfect squares
289 = 17² and 324 = 18² are the nearest perfect squares, so √297 lies between 17 and 18. 297 is 8 above 289 and 27 below 324, so the root is closer to 17.
- Straight line between 289 and 324: 17.2286 (0.03% low)
- Tangent from 17, i.e. 17 + 8 ÷ 34: 17.2353 (0.01% high)
- Tangent from 18, i.e. 18 − 27 ÷ 36: 17.2500 (0.09% high)
For √297 the tangent at 17 wins, missing by only 0.0016. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 297 is just 8 above 289.
Finding √297 with the Babylonian method
This is Newton’s method applied to f(x) = x² − 297: following the tangent line down to zero simplifies to averaging x with 297 ÷ x.
Start from the nearest whole number, 17 (17² = 289):
| Step | Guess x | 297 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.0000000000 | 17.4705882353 | 17.2352941176 | 2 |
| 2 | 17.2352941176 | 17.2320819113 | 17.2336880145 | 7 |
| 3 | 17.2336880145 | 17.2336878648 | 17.2336879396 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 2, 7 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √297 = 17.2336879396 to every decimal shown.
√297 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √297 the pattern is [17; 4, 3, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 4, 34] with the block of 10 terms after the semicolon repeating forever. A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √297 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 17/1 | 17.0000000000 | 2.3 × 10⁻¹ |
| 69/4 | 17.2500000000 | 1.6 × 10⁻² |
| 224/13 | 17.2307692308 | 2.9 × 10⁻³ |
| 293/17 | 17.2352941176 | 1.6 × 10⁻³ |
| 517/30 | 17.2333333333 | 3.5 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 1,327/77 | 17.2337662338 | 7.8 × 10⁻⁵ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 297y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 48,599, y = 2,820.
√297 in geometry and everyday measurements
- A square patio or deck of 297 square feet is about 17.23 ft (17 ft 3 in) on each side, so edging all the way around takes 4 × √297 ≈ 68.9 ft.
- 297 is not a sum of two whole-number squares — the prime factor 3 and 11 (one less than a multiple of 4) appears an odd number of times, which rules that out — so √297 is never the diagonal of a rectangle with whole-number sides. It is, however, the space diagonal of a 1 × 10 × 14 box, because 1² + 10² + 14² = 297.
- Since √297 = 3√33, a length of √297 is exactly 3 copies of the length √33 laid end to end.
Square roots near √297 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √294 | 7√6 | 17.1464 | No |
| √295 | √295 | 17.1756 | No |
| √296 | 2√74 | 17.2047 | No |
| √297 | 3√33 | 17.2337 | No |
| √298 | √298 | 17.2627 | No |
| √299 | √299 | 17.2916 | No |
| √300 | 10√3 | 17.3205 | No |
- The cube root of 297 is about 6.671940.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√297)² = 297, while 297² = 88,209 — the number whose square root is 297.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 297?
The square root of 297 is 3√33 in simplest radical form, which is about 17.2336879396. The negative root, −17.233688, also squares to 297.
Is the square root of 297 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 297 is not a perfect square — it falls between 289 and 324 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √297 be simplified?
Yes. The largest perfect square dividing 297 is 9, so √297 = √9 × √33 = 3√33.
What is √297 rounded to two decimal places?
√297 ≈ 17.23 to two decimal places (17.2 to one, 17.234 to three). Check: 17.23² = 296.8729, close to 297.