√270 at a glance
- Exact value
- 3√30
- Decimal (10 places)
- 16.4316767252
- Rounded
- 16.4 · 16.43 · 16.432
- Perfect square?
- No — between 16² and 17²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±16.431677
- Prime factorization
- 2 × 3³ × 5
- Cube root
- 6.463304
How to simplify √270
Look for the largest perfect square that divides 270. Here it is 9 (3²), because 270 = 9 × 30 and 30 has no square factor left:
The prime factorization tells the same story: 270 = 2 × 3³ × 5. Each pair of equal primes leaves the radical as one factor, so 3 comes out and 2 × 3 × 5 stays inside.
Check: (3√30)² = 3² × 30 = 9 × 30 = 270. As a decimal, 3√30 = 3 × 5.4772255751 ≈ 16.4316767252.
Where √270 sits between perfect squares
256 = 16² and 289 = 17² are the nearest perfect squares, so √270 lies between 16 and 17. 270 is 14 above 256 and 19 below 289, so the root is closer to 16.
- Straight line between 256 and 289: 16.4242 (0.05% low)
- Tangent from 16, i.e. 16 + 14 ÷ 32: 16.4375 (0.04% high)
- Tangent from 17, i.e. 17 − 19 ÷ 34: 16.4412 (0.06% high)
For √270 the tangent at 16 wins, missing by only 0.0058. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 270 is just 14 above 256.
Finding √270 with the Babylonian method
The idea is ancient. A Babylonian clay tablet catalogued as YBC 7289, about 3,800 years old, records √2 correct to roughly six decimal places, and Heron of Alexandria described this averaging rule in the first century AD.
Start from the nearest whole number, 16 (16² = 256):
| Step | Guess x | 270 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.0000000000 | 16.8750000000 | 16.4375000000 | 2 |
| 2 | 16.4375000000 | 16.4258555133 | 16.4316777567 | 5 |
| 3 | 16.4316777567 | 16.4316756937 | 16.4316767252 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 2, 5 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √270 = 16.4316767252 to every decimal shown.
√270 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √270 the pattern is [16; 2, 3, 6, 3, 2, 32] with the block of 6 terms after the semicolon repeating forever. A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √270 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 16/1 | 16.0000000000 | 4.3 × 10⁻¹ |
| 33/2 | 16.5000000000 | 6.8 × 10⁻² |
| 115/7 | 16.4285714286 | 3.1 × 10⁻³ |
| 723/44 | 16.4318181818 | 1.4 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 2,284/139 | 16.4316546763 | 2.2 × 10⁻⁵ |
| 5,291/322 | 16.4316770186 | 2.9 × 10⁻⁷ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 270y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 5,291, y = 322.
√270 in geometry and everyday measurements
- A square patio or deck of 270 square feet is about 16.43 ft (16 ft 5 in) on each side, so edging all the way around takes 4 × √270 ≈ 65.7 ft.
- 270 is not a sum of two whole-number squares — the prime factor 3 (one less than a multiple of 4) appears an odd number of times, which rules that out — so √270 is never the diagonal of a rectangle with whole-number sides. It is, however, the space diagonal of a 1 × 10 × 13 box, because 1² + 10² + 13² = 270.
- Since √270 = 3√30, a length of √270 is exactly 3 copies of the length √30 laid end to end.
Square roots near √270 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √267 | √267 | 16.3401 | No |
| √268 | 2√67 | 16.3707 | No |
| √269 | √269 | 16.4012 | No |
| √270 | 3√30 | 16.4317 | No |
| √271 | √271 | 16.4621 | No |
| √272 | 4√17 | 16.4924 | No |
| √273 | √273 | 16.5227 | No |
- The cube root of 270 is about 6.463304.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√270)² = 270, while 270² = 72,900 — the number whose square root is 270.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 270?
The square root of 270 is 3√30 in simplest radical form, which is about 16.4316767252. The negative root, −16.431677, also squares to 270.
Is the square root of 270 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 270 is not a perfect square — it falls between 256 and 289 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √270 be simplified?
Yes. The largest perfect square dividing 270 is 9, so √270 = √9 × √30 = 3√30.
What is √270 rounded to two decimal places?
√270 ≈ 16.43 to two decimal places (16.4 to one, 16.432 to three). Check: 16.43² = 269.9449, close to 270.