√279 at a glance
- Exact value
- 3√31
- Decimal (10 places)
- 16.7032930885
- Rounded
- 16.7 · 16.70 · 16.703
- Perfect square?
- No — between 16² and 17²
- Rational?
- Irrational
- Both square roots
- ±16.703293
- Prime factorization
- 3² × 31
- Cube root
- 6.534335
How to simplify √279
Look for the largest perfect square that divides 279. Here it is 9 (3²), because 279 = 9 × 31 and 31 has no square factor left:
The prime factorization tells the same story: 279 = 3² × 31. Each pair of equal primes leaves the radical as one factor, so 3 comes out and 31 stays inside.
Check: (3√31)² = 3² × 31 = 9 × 31 = 279. As a decimal, 3√31 = 3 × 5.5677643628 ≈ 16.7032930885.
Where √279 sits between perfect squares
256 = 16² and 289 = 17² are the nearest perfect squares, so √279 lies between 16 and 17. 279 is 23 above 256 and 10 below 289, so the root is closer to 17.
- Straight line between 256 and 289: 16.6970 (0.04% low)
- Tangent from 16, i.e. 16 + 23 ÷ 32: 16.7188 (0.09% high)
- Tangent from 17, i.e. 17 − 10 ÷ 34: 16.7059 (0.02% high)
For √279 the tangent at 17 wins, missing by only 0.0026. Tangent estimates shine when the number sits close to a perfect square — here 279 is just 10 below 289.
Finding √279 with the Babylonian method
If a guess is too big, 279 ÷ x is too small by about the same amount, so their average lands much closer. In fact an error of e shrinks to roughly e² ÷ (2√279) in one step.
Start from the nearest whole number, 17 (17² = 289):
| Step | Guess x | 279 ÷ x | Average | Correct decimals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.0000000000 | 16.4117647059 | 16.7058823529 | 2 |
| 2 | 16.7058823529 | 16.7007042254 | 16.7032932891 | 6 |
| 3 | 16.7032932891 | 16.7032928878 | 16.7032930885 | all 10 shown |
The count of correct decimals went 2, 6 and all 10 over 3 steps — roughly doubling each time — until the guess matched √279 = 16.7032930885 to every decimal shown.
√279 as a continued fraction
Every irrational square root has a continued fraction that repeats. For √279 the pattern is [16; 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 32] with the block of 8 terms after the semicolon repeating forever. A pattern that never ends is one more proof that √279 is irrational.
Cutting the continued fraction off early gives the best fractions for approximating the root — no fraction with a smaller denominator comes closer:
| Fraction | Decimal | Error |
|---|---|---|
| 16/1 | 16.0000000000 | 7.0 × 10⁻¹ |
| 17/1 | 17.0000000000 | 3.0 × 10⁻¹ |
| 50/3 | 16.6666666667 | 3.7 × 10⁻² |
| 117/7 | 16.7142857143 | 1.1 × 10⁻² |
| 167/10 | 16.7000000000 | 3.3 × 10⁻³ |
| 451/27 | 16.7037037037 | 4.1 × 10⁻⁴ |
The same fractions solve Pell’s equation, x² − 279y² = 1. Its smallest solution in positive whole numbers is x = 1,520, y = 91.
√279 in geometry and everyday measurements
- A square patio or deck of 279 square feet is about 16.7 ft (16 ft 8 in) on each side, so edging all the way around takes 4 × √279 ≈ 66.8 ft.
- 279 is not a sum of two whole-number squares — the prime factor 31 (one less than a multiple of 4) appears an odd number of times, which rules that out — so √279 is never the diagonal of a rectangle with whole-number sides. It is not a sum of three positive squares either, so no whole-number box has √279 as its space diagonal.
- Since √279 = 3√31, a length of √279 is exactly 3 copies of the length √31 laid end to end.
Square roots near √279 and related roots
| Root | Simplest form | Decimal | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
| √276 | 2√69 | 16.6132 | No |
| √277 | √277 | 16.6433 | No |
| √278 | √278 | 16.6733 | No |
| √279 | 3√31 | 16.7033 | No |
| √280 | 2√70 | 16.7332 | No |
| √281 | √281 | 16.7631 | No |
| √282 | √282 | 16.7929 | No |
- The cube root of 279 is about 6.534335.
- Squaring undoes the root: (√279)² = 279, while 279² = 77,841 — the number whose square root is 279.
Frequently asked questions
What is the square root of 279?
The square root of 279 is 3√31 in simplest radical form, which is about 16.7032930885. The negative root, −16.703293, also squares to 279.
Is the square root of 279 rational or irrational?
Irrational. 279 is not a perfect square — it falls between 256 and 289 — and the square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square cannot be written as a fraction.
Can √279 be simplified?
Yes. The largest perfect square dividing 279 is 9, so √279 = √9 × √31 = 3√31.
What is √279 rounded to two decimal places?
√279 ≈ 16.70 to two decimal places (16.7 to one, 16.703 to three). Check: 16.70² = 278.89, close to 279.